Choose the path that matches the problem.
Different buyers arrive with different pain. Struvo works best when you enter through the path that matches what is actually broken in your workflow right now.
What should be clear already
Pick the problem you need solved first. The next step should feel obvious.
Routes
Four paths. One right next step.
Pick the path that matches the problem you already feel. The next step should get clearer, not more abstract.
I need one report done
Use one real site visit to judge artifact quality and fit.
Start the free report pathWe have repeated site visits
See how continuity turns repeated site work into one coherent job record.
See the PM pathWe need team consistency
See how Struvo helps a small team produce cleaner, more coherent field documentation without a heavyweight rollout.
See the leadership pathWe need a custom rollout
Talk through how the same documentation layer expands when the standard path stops fitting.
Talk through the fitGuidance
How to choose well
These are the rules that keep the GTM clean: start with the pressure point, follow the artifact, and expand only when the workflow earns it.
Start narrow
Do not buy the whole story first. Start with the pressure point you already feel.
Follow the artifact
Trust should come from what you can actually see: the report, the carry-forward context, and the signal quality.
Expand only when earned
Free proves the artifact, Single keeps occasional use simple, Team handles repeated rhythm, and custom comes later only when the standard path stops fitting.
Final step
Still not sure where to start?
If the problem is fuzzy, the best default is still one real report. The artifact will usually tell you what the right next move is.